Tax News

Congress Extends “Temporary” Tax Cuts

As 2014 drew to a close, Congress voted to extend 54 “temporary” tax cuts for the 2014 tax year. The Senate vote finally passed the week after Congress was supposed to adjourn for the year, producing a collective sigh of relief among taxpayers. The numerous cuts will benefit a wide range of taxpayers, ranging from large businesses and corporations to struggling homeowners. The list below describes eight of the most popular deductions that were extended.


  • Tuition deduction. Whether you itemize your taxes or not, this tax cut allows you to deduct up to $4,000 in tuition, fees and related expenses for post-secondary education for yourself or your dependents.
  • Mortgage insurance premiums. If you are required to pay mortgage insurance to your lender, this deduction allows you to deduct the cost of your premiums if you itemize your tax return.
  • Mortgage debt exclusion. The mortgage crisis has forced many homeowners into foreclosure or a short sale. If your house was sold for less than you owe, the bank will often forgive the debt. However, the IRS considers the amount forgiven to be taxable income. This deduction allows you to exclude the forgiven amount from your income.
  • Teachers’ deduction. Whether a teacher itemizes their tax return or not, this tax cut allows him or her to deduct up to $250 in out-of-pocket expenses for classroom supplies.
  • Commuting costs. Commuters can reduce their pre-tax income based on their commuting costs. People who drive to work and pay to park may deduct $250 per month. Commuters using mass transit may deduct $130 per month.
  • Sales tax. If you itemize your tax return, this measure allows you to deduct the state and local sales taxes you’ve paid in 2014 instead of state income taxes. This deduction especially benefits individuals living in one of seven states that do not have a state income tax.
  • Energy credit. You can deduct up to 10 percent of the cost of qualified energy-efficient products (between $50 and $500) purchased for your home in 2014. This deduction does not apply to new homes. The qualified product must have been bought and installed into your primary residence in 2014.
  • IRA withdrawals for charity. If you are over 70 1/2 years old, you may make a tax-free charitable contribution from your IRA up to $100,000. The contribution will not count as a deduction, but it will decrease your taxable income.

congressAs advantageous as these tax breaks may be in preparing your 2014 tax returns, don’t get used to them. They technically expired as of December 31, 2014, which means Congress will go through the same process at the end of this year. And while these cuts benefit millions of individuals, analysts estimate the extensions will add $42 billion to the national debt over the next 10 years.  Don’t be surprised if Congress allows many, if not all of these tax breaks to expire as a result.

Credit Administration Needs Better Oversight

The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration says that a quarter of all of Earned Income Tax Credit payments made in 2012 were not proper payments. Is this announcement from the Inspector General  IRS tax news or an indication of more deeply rooted problems? Either way, it appears the agency needs better oversight in administering EITC credits, which benefit so many low and moderate-income taxpayers and their families.

A Change In Payment Protocols Is Needed

Many EITC payments were made to people who were not entitled to them, while some legitimate recipients received the wrong amount. The total amount of improper EITC payments totaled an astonishing $14.5 billion of the $63 billion in credits paid, according to the report. It appears that the EITC represents one of the biggest risks for placing billions of dollars in the wrong hands.

The federal watchdog agency that monitors the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) operates under the Improper Payment Elimination Recovery Act of 2010. Its most recent report notes that agency oversight is seriously lacking. The amounts of those incorrect payments, unacceptably high at 25%, are significant and considerably above the government expectations for an error rate of 2.5%. Lax oversight is a major contributing factor to the total shortfall, estimated to total between $124 billion to $148 billion.

A Change In The System

A high level of mismanagement also occurs with the Additional Child Tax Credit, intended to assist larger low-income families in reducing their tax burden. Improper credits by the IRS totaled 25% to 30% of the program’s total payouts. These improperly administered credits amount to between $5.9 billion to $7.1 billion in total.

Auditors from the watchdog agency contend that the IRS needs to make significant changes in their existing systems. Clearly the present protocols have failed in preventing errors and improper payments

The watchdog agency recommended expanding IRS authority to allow the agency to make corrections in tax returns it receives to prevent improper payment of refundable tax credits. This change alone could avoid improper payments totaling more than $1.7 billion, according to the auditor.  While the IRS reported agreed with the watchdog agency’s recommendations, recent budget cuts continue to make it difficult — if not impossible — to effectively enforce compliance.

Jersey Shore Star Michael Sorrentino Charged with $9M Tax Fraud

Michael Sorrentino, better known as “The Situation,” made his fortune starring on the reality television show, “Jersey Shore.” And for all six seasons, he earned approximately $150,000 per episode. But now, Sorrentino has found himself in a situation he would rather have avoided.

“The Situation” Failed to Pay Taxes on $9M Income

Sorrentino and his older brother and business manager, Marc Sorrentino, were arrested and indicted early Septtember 24th, on a total of 7 different charges involving tax fraud. The pair was each charged with one count of conspiring to defraud the United States. In addition, Marc was charged with three counts of filing false tax returns for 2010-2012. Mike was charged with two of the same counts for that time period, along with being accused of failing to file a tax return in 2011, when he reportedly earned nearly $2 million. (Yahoo News)

The older brother and manager, Marc Sorrentino faces up to 14 years in prison for his charges, while Mike is facing up to 11 years along with up to $600,000.00 worth of fines. The pair plead not guilty in a Newark, NJ federal court yesterday, and are currently out on a $250,000 bond. Their next court appearance is scheduled for October 6, 2014.

These federal charges stem from the pair allegedly failing to pay taxes on nearly $9 million worth of income earned between 2010 and 2012. The indictment names the two individuals along with several companies reported to be owned by the pair. These companies include MPS Entertainment, Situation Nation, and Situation Productions.

Another Celebrity Caught by the IRS

The income, totaling $8.9 million dollars, reportedly was earned from a variety of sources besides the Jersey Shore. Personal and television appearances, ownership of an online clothing business, the publication of an autobiography and a comic book featuring the Situation as a superhero are just a few. Also, as he grew to be nearly as popular as co-star Snooki, his name was put on DVDs, clothing lines, jewelry, tuxedos, and designer sunglasses.

“The brothers allegedly claimed costly clothes and cars as business expenses and funneled company money into personal accounts,” claimed the U.S. Attorney. He went on to say “The law is absolutely clear: telling the truth to the IRS is not optional.” –

Sorrentino popularized the phrase, “Gym, Tan, Laundry” when he referred to the pre-party ritual of he and his housemates on Jersey Shore. His popularity on the show and his reputation for drinking heavily also lead him to many endorsement deals, including one with Devotion Vodka. He was also well known for showing off his finely toned abdominal muscles, leading him to release a work-out DVD and gain an endorsement with GNC Vitamins. He appeared on Season 11 of “Dancing With The Stars” but was eliminated after just the 4th round.

This makes him yet another well-paid celebrity, like Vanessa Williams and Conan O’Brien, has been targeted by the IRS.

When asked for a comment on his tax woes, Sorrentino reportedly said, “The situation will sort itself out.”

Corporate Tax Inversion: The Tax Strategy That’s Losing the IRS Big Bucks

During much of 2014, tax inversion stories were prominent in the news. Companies with household names like Pfizer, Walgreens and Burger King attempted, aborted or accomplished corporate maneuvers designed to create corporate tax inversions. Despite the firestorm of protest from lawmakers and the general public, all indications point to a continuation of corporations opting for the tax-saving strategy.

A corporate tax inversion is a method by which companies try to reduce their corporate tax bills by re-establishing headquarters overseas, typically through an acquisition. – Chicago Tribune

If you’re not familiar with the concept, the term “tax inversion” might send you running for an umbrella and a gas mask. In reality, what you might want to protect is your wallet. According to a May 2014 report issued by Deloitte, corporate tax inversion could result in a loss of nearly $20 billion in federal tax revenue from 2015 through 2024. Fewer corporate tax revenues may well translate to cuts in services or increases in taxes, fees and other expenses for individual taxpayers.

A More Agreeable (Tax) Climate

Have you noticed that many American companies are incorporated in Delaware, even though they have few or no actual operations there? That’s because Delaware has very liberal incorporation laws. Delaware is also considered one of the most tax-friendly states for corporations to set up their legal bases of operations. But for some companies, even Delaware is not tax-friendly enough.

Corporate tax inversion occurs when American companies purchase or merge with foreign companies and move their corporate headquarters to the foreign country where the other company is located.

This allows the American company to reduce its corporate tax burden on the operations located in its corporate headquarters, because the corporate income tax rate for many foreign countries is significantly lower than the 35 percent imposed by the United States. At the same time, the company retains access to its American customer base. Business as usual, but major tax savings.

Earnings Stripping and Hopscotching

Corporations must pay taxes on profits earned within the US. But corporate tax inversion may generate tax savings on domestic revenues as well. The process is called “earnings stripping,” and it works like this.

The newly established foreign headquarters grants a “loan” to its American division. The payments that the American division makes to the foreign headquarters are subtracted from its taxable profits.

According to an August 2014 report in Newsday, American corporations are hoarding more than $2 billion overseas. Hopscotching involves US based companies funneling profits earned overseas through a foreign headquarters. This tactic allows companies to invest those earnings without paying US corporate income tax.

Related article: Should We Abolish Corporate Income Taxes?

Have It Your Way, Eh?

Tech heavyweight Seagate and Stanley, a 170-year-old tool stalwart, are just two companies that relocated their headquarters outside the US in the opening years of the 21st century. A parade of American companies, including Tyco International, Fruit of the Loom and Ingersoll-Rand either considered or executed moving their headquarters outside the U.S. to cut corporate taxes during that period.

The legislative response was a 2004 law designed to put a halt to corporate defections. The 2004 law prohibited American companies from skirting US corporate income taxes by moving their headquarters overseas but leaving the same leadership and shareholders in place. Instead, American companies would be required to acquire or merge with a foreign company. Shareholders of the foreign company must acquire at least 20 percent of the shares for the new parent company. (International Tax Review)

The most recent wave of corporate defections was designed to follow the 2004 anti-inversion law. Pfizer launched a failed bid to purchase AstraZeneca and move its headquarters to London. Walgreens announced plans to acquire remaining 55 percent of Alliance Boots GmbH, a European drug store chain, but nixed plans to move its base of operations to Switzerland under intense criticism. (Des Moines Register)

The latest defector, Burger King, made an August 2014 announcement of its plans to acquire Canadian doughnut and coffee chain Tim Horton’s and move its corporate headquarters north of the border. The move allows Burger King to trim the corporate tax burden for its headquarters to 15 percent federal tax and 11.5 percent Ontario provincial tax. It is worth noting that Prime Minister Stephen Harper lowered Canada’s federal corporate tax rate from 28 percent to 15 percent after taking office in 2006.

What Congress (Won’t Likely) Do About Inversion

During the period between 2002 and 2004, anti-inversion legislation enjoyed strong bipartisan support in both houses of Congress. Such support is absent in the highly partisan environment of the 113th Congress. So, despite an anti-inversion bill introduced in May 2014 by Representative Sander Levin and Senator Carl Levin, it is unlikely that any substantive action will occur to address corporate tax inversions. That is, at least before the November 2014 election.

The Silver Lining: You Won’t Lose Your Job

Despite the fact that American corporations seem primed to continue announcing and carrying out corporate tax inversions, there is a silver lining. Unlike off shoring or outsourcing, tax inversions do not usually involve wholesale shipping of American jobs overseas.

So at least American workers won’t lose their jobs, even if American taxpayers eventually foot the bill to fill the hole created by corporate tax inversions.

Vanessa Williams Hit with $370,000 IRS Tax Lien

Singer, actress and former Miss America Vanessa Williams is the latest in a progression of celebrities to be hit by the IRS hammer. According to various news reports, the IRS filed a lien against Williams for $369,249 against the entertainer’s 2011 federal income tax return. Williams reportedly failed to pay an IRS assessment posted in 2012, which prompted the IRS to file the lien on August 13, 2014.

During the Hollywood segment of the Doug Banks Radio Show, the talk show hosts raise a good question: “How does this happen to celebrities?” After all, during the 2011 period of the lien, Williams had just finished Ugly Betty and was starring in Desperate Housewives. The money  was flowing, so why wasn’t the IRS paid?

Maybe it was the accountant’s error and Williams wasn’t even aware of the lien, similar to Conan O’Brien’s brush with the IRS earlier this year.

Here She Is . . .

This is not the first time the 51 year old Williams has had a brush with scandal. Soon after being crowned the first black Miss America in September 1983, nude photographs of the beauty queen that had been taken before her pageant days surfaced. The photos were published without her consent in Penthouse magazine. As a result of the scandal, Williams relinquished her crown to Suzette Charles.

Williams rebounded from the scandal, moving on to a successful recording career. Her debut album The Right Stuff, released in 1988, went gold, along with earning three Grammy nominations for Williams, including Best New Artist. Her third album, Save the Best for Last, released in 1994, went platinum. Williams has also enjoyed success on the silver screen and on television.

In Good Company

The notice for the lien was reportedly delivered to the office of Williams’s accountant in New York City, although Williams lives in Chappaqua, New York. There was no public statement from Williams or her accountant concerning whether Williams was aware of the lien or of her plans to handle the matter. (Comedian and talk show host Conan O’Brien nearly lost his house in Westerly, Rhode Island this year when notice of $8,000 in delinquent county taxes was delivered to the wrong address.)

Other celebrities who have run into trouble with the IRS over unpaid federal income taxes include Lauryn Hill, former lead singer for the Fugees, Courtney Love, widow of grunge rocker Kurt Cobain and singer for the group Hole; soul singer Lionel Richie, rapper Flo Rida and action star Wesley Snipes. Both Hill and Snipes served time in federal prison for failure to pay federal income taxes. At present, there is no indication that criminal charges are pending against Williams.

Conan O’Brien Pays Back Taxes, Avoids Home Auction

In the 2003 film House of Sand and Fog, Jennifer Connolly’s character loses her house due to nonpayment of a relatively small amount of delinquent county property taxes. Ben Kingsley’s character purchases the house at auction for a fraction of its appraised value and begins making renovations to the property. The movie ends with tragic loss of life – and Connolly’s character never gets her house back.

Comedian Conan O’Brien didn’t face tragedy on this scale, but he did come within days of losing his house, valued at more than $720, 000, due to $8,000 in delinquent taxes. The home was one of several that were slated for auction on Tuesday, June 24 by the town of Westerly, Rhode Island, where the house is located. (Source: USAToday)

Lost in the Mail

O’Brien, whose late night talk show on TBS has been renewed through 2018, was not facing financial difficulties that prevented him from paying the tax bill. Instead, the bill was apparently mailed to the wrong address and never reached his accountant in Los Angeles. O’Brien only learned of the risk of losing his house through a reporter’s story published in the Westerly Sun. O’Brien paid the bill on June 20 – as soon as he learned about the mix-up.

The heads-up from the local newspaper came just in time. As soon as O’Brien posted payment on the house, it was pulled from the auction list. Other homeowners who have gotten into arrears with their property taxes have not been nearly so fortunate.

Other celebrities in the news for tax troubles: Lauryn Hill, Courtney Love, Teresa Guidice

Search and Seizure

The story depicted in House of Sand and Fog was highly dramatized in the interest of drawing an audience. But the circumstances surrounding Connolly’s character losing her home and Kingsley’s character being able to purchase it for cheap were fairly accurate. Like the Treasury Department and the IRS, local municipalities and counties are serious about collecting tax revenues. Even when the collection process involves conducting fire sales of property owned by delinquent taxpayers.

Local and county governments routinely seize and sell properties due to unpaid property taxes that total only a fraction of the value of the homes that have been seized. While the execution of the policy can appear borderline ridiculous at times, the principle behind the practice is understandable. After all, a significant portion of the revenue of a city, town or county is derived from property taxes. No property tax collections=no revenue.

Want to know how ridiculous? Earlier this year, Pennsylvania widow Eileen Battisti lost her $280,000 home over a measly $6.30 tax bill. That’s right, six bucks.

Due Diligence

O’Brien’s near-loss of his home also illustrates the need for taxpayers to take a proactive approach to managing their affairs. In O’Brien’s case, the mistake was not made by him or by his accountant. Nonetheless, to learn about your own tax troubles in the news is risky. Had he not paid the amount in arrears in time, he would have lost the house because of a bit of lost mail.

It is possible that O’Brien could have taken legal action had the auction gone ahead. But the process would have been complex and messy, especially if his house had been purchased by a good faith purchaser in the interim. You can bet that O’Brien and his accountant will examine his financial affairs with a fine tooth comb going forward to prevent a similar incident in the future.

Taxed! Frequent Flyer Miles

In 2012, a Citibank customer received a 1099 tax form informing him he was liable to pay $625 in taxes for the 25,000 American Airlines miles he had received as a “gift” for opening a checking and savings account package. Needless to say, he was shocked to find out that as far the the IRS was concerned his frequent flyer miles were taxable income. He and others in his situation complained.

However, Citibank was not to blame; the bank was simply following IRS taxation rules. This story was enough to send droves of clients running for cover from credit card rewards programs altogether out of fear of being hit with unexpected tax bills. Even respectable finance advice outlets overreacted to these stories and provided inaccurate and unhelpful advice on how the IRS taxes credit card reward points. This is sad. Customers who ignore credit card reward points are missing out on a great way of getting free cash just by being smart about how they pay for their everyday living expenses.

If, like me, you carefully collect credit card points throughout the year to finance the lion’s share of your vacation expenses, you may have wondered – or even worried — whether you should declare your hard-earned points when it comes to filing your tax return. Although the IRS could be clearer on how it treats credit card rewards, it has published information on the matter. So finding out your tax liability is just a matter of digging into the murky waters of IRS tax regulations publications. I know, you’ve got better things to do; but I don’t. So I did all the heavy reading for you. You’re welcome.

Nontaxable Discounts and Rebates Vs. Taxable Interest and Bribes

IRS Publication 17 provides a detailed breakdown of which sources of income are taxable and which are not. I’m afraid there are no surprises here. Pretty much every type of income you can think of is taxable. This includes unemployment benefits, life insurance proceeds, alimony, gambling earnings, lotteries, raffles and even bribes. Yes, the IRS publication actually says: “If you receive a bribe, include it in your income.”

Nevertheless, there are two sources of income the IRS does not tax: rebates and rewards. Not surprisingly, there is a caveat when it comes to rewards: “If you receive a reward for providing information, include it in your income.” So does that include credit card rewards or not? This lack of clarity is what has created the current confusion, which is why the IRS published a specific statement on frequent flyer miles and credit card points in their 2002-18 Announcement.

The statement provided the following clarification:

“The IRS will not assert that any taxpayer has understated his federal tax liability by reason of the receipt of personal use of frequent flyer miles or other in-kind promotional benefits.” –

In classic IRS style the paragraph finishes with the tip “Any future guidance on the taxability of these benefits will be applied prospectively.” This means that, as of 2013, the IRS does not require you to declare the cash value of their credit card rewards and frequent flyer miles when you file your taxes; and even if they were to tax them in the future it will not be charged retroactively.

However, there is a big exception to this general rule when it comes to rewards you receive for making deposits or opening an account with a bank or other financial institution. In these cases the IRS considers the rewards as interest and therefore taxable. The IRS Publication 550 Investment Income and Expenses specifically says “for deposits of less than $5,000, gifts or services valued at more than $10 must be reported as interest. For deposits of $5,000 or more, gifts or services valued at more than $20 must be reported as interest.” This exception is what triggered the $625 tax bill for the Citibank customer mentioned at the outset.

The Bottom Line

In short, the IRS treats credit card rewards you earn when you purchase things, such as cash back, frequent flyer miles and points, as a reduction in the purchase price or as a rebate, which are not taxable. So you don’t have to worry about declaring your precious rewards as long as you don’t earn them by making a deposit (not a purchase) when opening an account.

One Last Caveat for Business Owners

The reason credit card rewards are not taxable income is because the IRS considers them a discount or price reduction, not as interest or as prize. Unfortunately, this also means you cannot claim as a business expense any item you buy or saving you receive with your credit card reward points. For instance, if a $2,000 business flight only costs you $1,000 after using your frequent flyer miles, you may only claim $1,000 toward travel expenses–not the full ticket value.

This article was written by staff writer Andrew Latham. His mission is to help fight your evil debt blob and get your personal finances in tip top shape.
Copyright © 2013 Andrew Latham
Photo: The-Lane-Team

No Pay-No Drive: New York Suspends Licenses for Back Taxes

It’s no secret, many states are broke and looking for ways to recoup revenue. Of course, most states have a long list of taxes owed by residents. New York state – which actually has an impressive collection rate of 96% — is in hot in pursuit of the those who haven’t paid up. The remaining 4% are on a list of 16,000 residents who each owe in excess of $10,000 in back taxes. Combined, they owe $1.1 billion. To collect, Governor Andrew Cuomo is pulling out a big hammer: he’s suspending their driver’s licenses until they make good on their tax debts.

This is part of the current year budget initiative passed by the state legislature back in March. It’s expected to increase collections this fiscal year (ending March 31, 2014) by $26 million, and another $6 million annually in subsequent years.

Governor Cuomo said in a press release: “Our message is simple: tax scofflaws who don’t abide by the same rules as everyone else are not entitled to the same privileges as everyone else. These worst offenders are putting an unfair burden on the overwhelming majority of New Yorkers who are hardworking, law-abiding taxpayers. By enacting these additional consequences, we’re providing additional incentives for the state to receive the money it is owed and we’re keeping scofflaws off the very roads they refuse to pay their fair share to maintain.”

Say what you will about equity, it’s a money thing. After all, not everyone who owes taxes drives a car, and not everyone who drives a car owes taxes.

“As more and more states experience cash shortfalls, they’re looking for ways to replenish their coffers,” observed CPA Robert A. Raiola. Raiola heads the Sports & Entertainment Group for the New Jersey–based accounting firm of Fazio, Mannuzza, Roche, Tankel, LaPilusa, LLC. “As a result, we may see more states following New York’s lead with stricter enforcement of existing laws.”

How the Suspension Works

Round one of warning notices gives recipients 60 days to pay up. For those who do not respond, round two warnings will be issued, with 15 days to comply. After that, the taxpayer’s license is suspended.

Anyone caught driving on a suspended license will pay a mandatory fine of $200 to $500, depending on the circumstances, and could face jail time or probation up to 30 days. Those caught in a second offense could be subject to much stiffer penalties, including the loss of a vehicle.

New York Commissioner of Taxation and Finance Thomas H. Mattox said in a press release: “It’s in every taxpayer’s best interest to pay all tax bills in full. If you can’t pay in full, our staff is available to help you arrange a payment plan that will satisfy your debt.”

Some may also be able to obtain restricted licenses which will allow them to continue commuting to and from work.

What’s the lesson?

Whether it’s a matter of a government desperate for revenue or out to achieve equity… states have big hammers. Nobody has to get to this point, but you’ll probably need the help of a trusted tax adviser early on.

Photo:  aftab

Bill seeks to extend state tax relief for mortgage debt forgiveness – Will It Happen?

One of the near-casualties of the Fiscal Cliff earlier this year was the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act, which expired on December 31st, 2012. However, on January 3rd, 2013, President Obama signed The American Taxpayer Relief Act, which extended the deadline of the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act one more year to December 31st, 2013.

The Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act was originally enacted in 2007 to accommodate the rising number of homeowners who had to do short sales as a result of the housing crisis.

A short sale occurs when a lender allows the homeowner to sell their home at a price that is lower than what is owed on the mortgage. The difference between the amount owed and the sales price is “forgiven” by the lender.

As with most forms of debt relief, the amount forgiven by the lender has been historically treated as taxable income by the IRS (adding insult to injury for the home seller).

When the housing crisis began to unfold, Congress and the Legislature decided not to consider canceled housing debt as income. This applied to canceled debt from foreclosure, the refinancing of a home loan or the short sale of a primary residence up to $2 million.

The California state law providing more relief, the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act of 2007, expired at the end of 2012. This excluded up to $500K from taxable income in the form of debt forgiveness.

In California, AB 42, a bill that seeks to extend state tax relief for mortgage debt forgiveness was presented by Assemblyman Henry Perea, D-Fresno earlier this month. AB 42 would mirror the federal law and extend state income tax relief for debt forgiveness up until the end of 2013.

The Franchise Tax Board estimated the local impact to be a $50 million reduction in state income tax for 2013.

Since California’s mortgage debt forgiveness bill could affect state revenues, the measure was set aside until further analysis could take place regarding next year’s budget projections.

Brenda Harjala is a staff writer for Optima Tax Relief. Her mission is to help consumers stay financially savvy, and save some money with tax relief.

Study Says Even Savers Spend Their Refunds

Via LearnVest By Alden Wicker ~

tax refundThe refund checks are in the mail, and millions of Americans are feeling a bit flush this tax season.

(Still haven’t done your taxes? Start here.)

You might be one of the smart Americans who plan to use their refund to reach a financial goal. According to a TD Ameritrade survey released last month, of the almost half of Americans expecting a check, 47% plan to save some of it and 44% plan to pay off debt with the money.

Only 15% wanted to use the whole thing to splurge on something discretionary.

While the savers will mostly go through with their plan, TODAY reports that they still might treat themselves to something, even unconsciously.

Research shows that there’s an immediate, though small, bump in spending among people who receive tax refunds the week they get it, even if they planned on saving it. Then there’s another small bump in spending in August, indicating people might be using the money to augment their summer vacation.

So you might as well make it official. Set aside 10% of your refund to treat yourself, you deserve it for navigating that tax maze! Then use the rest to help reach a financial goal or two.

LearnVest is the leading lifestyle and personal finance website for women.

The post Study Says Even Savers Spend Their Refunds appeared first on SuperMoney!.